From owner-freebsd-doc Mon Sep 9 17:49:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B45D37B401 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 17:49:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E182D43E75 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 17:49:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mij@soupnazi.org) Received: (qmail 45655 invoked by uid 1111); 10 Sep 2002 00:49:15 -0000 Date: 9 Sep 2002 17:49:15 -0700 Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 17:49:15 -0700 From: Jim Mock To: Lawrence Sica Cc: "Nickolay A. Kritsky" , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Anti-virus section for FAQ Message-ID: <20020910004915.GA44779@soupnazi.org> Reply-To: mij@soupnazi.org References: <318821464.20020909160529@internethelp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 09 Sep 2002 at 13:16:11 -0400, Lawrence Sica wrote: > On Monday, September 9, 2002, at 08:05 AM, Nickolay A. Kritsky wrote: > >Friday, September 06, 2002, 10:23:43 PM, you wrote: LS> Oops, helps > >if I post the url eh ;) > > > >LS> http://www.thesicafamily.org/larry/articles/avfaq.html > > > >I would like to add to this list following AV solution: "Procmail > >Email Sanitizer" - > >http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/procmail-security.html > > > >To comment the FAQ itself. I do not think that just the list of > >antivirus packages is a good answer for FAQ. The thing is, that > >freqentissimus AV-related question sounds like "What is the best AV > >for freebsd/sendmail/qmail?" not just "What kind of antiviruses do > >you know?". I think, that it would be truly useful if people, who > >have an experience with setting up AV on FreeBSD share their > >knowledge with us in the manner like this: > > The goes beyond the purpose of the FAQ tho, it was meant to be a short > list of possible software out there. More information would be suited > more towards a handbook information. To do that for every package > would make it a seperate FAQ. I had planned on a more in depth > article as well, but for the FAQ a short, simple list is best imho. > Other opinions? This list is meant to be an unbiased bit on what is > out there, not an in depth review and rating of each package.. What about expanding it and adding it to the handbook's email chapter instead of the FAQ? I think it's probably better suited there anyway... - jim -- jim mock jim@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message