From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jul 10 10:54:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB841514E for ; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 10:54:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shovey@buffnet.net) Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net (buffnet11.buffnet.net [205.246.19.55]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA03844; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 13:54:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from shovey@buffnet.net) Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 13:54:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Steve Hovey To: Mark Thomas Cc: Don Croyle , questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.0? In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19990710135451.00971100@pop3.clark.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well it seems no matter what the freeBSD focus on THEY KICK BUTT! :) On Sat, 10 Jul 1999, Mark Thomas wrote: > At 01:38 PM 7/10/99 -0400, Steve Hovey wrote: > > > > > >On 10 Jul 1999, Don Croyle wrote: > > > >> Steve Hovey writes: > >> > >> > out of curiousity, whats new about 4 that caused the jump in numbering > >> > from 3.X? > >> > >> Initially, nothing. Now, quite a bit. > >> > >> Once the development tree was fairly stable 3 was branched off from > >> it. 3.x releases are mainly bug fixes and drop in updates, the basic > >> feature set is frozen. The development branch, with its number bumped > > > >I thought 3 was 3 because of dual processor support stuff. > > Not to mention AOUT => ELF. > > > Mark > --- > thomas@clark.net ---> http://www.clark.net/pub/thomas > PBEM Eldritch --------> http://www.pmpro.com/eldritch > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message