From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 25 10:43:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D738AEC; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:43:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from theravensnest.org (theraven.freebsd.your.org [216.14.102.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A46092D1C; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:43:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.60.213.211] (173-13-112-142-NewEngland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.13.112.142]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9PAgeNx063165 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:42:41 GMT (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: svn commit: r257109 - head/contrib/llvm/tools/clang/tools/driver Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: David Chisnall X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: <2DE0EA95F6944DB28D4B2F03EEF582F8@multiplay.co.uk> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 06:42:36 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7DCDC9F2-776B-41AC-B34F-8A5144A4AF0D@FreeBSD.org> References: <201310250909.r9P990nk083926@svn.freebsd.org> <2DE0EA95F6944DB28D4B2F03EEF582F8@multiplay.co.uk> To: "Steven Hartland" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, Dimitry Andric , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:43:06 -0000 On 25 Oct 2013, at 06:03, "Steven Hartland" = wrote: > As discussed on IRC while I agree removing CC is possibly the better > fix moving forward, I think removing /usr/bin/CC has quite a bit more > risk, especially at this stage in the release phase of 10. I'm not sure what the risk is. CC is an IRIXism that was never part of = any standard. Linux distros don't seem to provide a CC, just a c++, so = this is unlikely to cause problems with ported code. =20 We've discussed removing CC for a while, and I think it's the right = call. David