From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Dec 8 7: 9:36 2000 From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 8 07:09:34 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A3B37B402 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 07:09:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from newsguy.com (p60-dn01kiryunisiki.gunma.ocn.ne.jp [211.0.245.61]) by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN/) with ESMTP id AAA26083; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 00:09:26 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <3A30E21F.846E3863@newsguy.com> Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 22:29:03 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR MIME-Version: 1.0 To: janb@cs.utep.edu Cc: Kirk McKusick , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Getting Kernel Process Information References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG janb@cs.utep.edu wrote: > > > to user processes. I recognize that there are better ways > > to handle these issues. I am just trying to make an > > What are some of the better ways of handling the issue? Userland kobj. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@the.great.underground.bsdconpiracy.org "The bronze landed last, which canceled that method of impartial choice." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message