From owner-freebsd-lite2  Thu Sep 19 01:06:44 1996
Return-Path: owner-lite2
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA06439
          for lite2-outgoing; Thu, 19 Sep 1996 01:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (root@spinner.DIALix.COM [192.203.228.67])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA06391
          for <freebsd-lite2@freefall.freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 1996 01:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (peter@localhost.DIALix.oz.au [127.0.0.1])
          by spinner.DIALix.COM (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA25561
          for <freebsd-lite2@freefall.freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 1996 16:06:33 +0800 (WST)
Message-Id: <199609190806.QAA25561@spinner.DIALix.COM>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.7 5/3/96
To: freebsd-lite2@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_lock.c src/sys/sys lock.h 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 19 Sep 1996 00:59:43 MST."
             <199609190759.AAA03471@freefall.freebsd.org> 
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 16:06:33 +0800
From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com>
Sender: owner-lite2@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Peter Wemm wrote:
> peter       96/09/19 00:59:42
> 
>   Removed:     sys/kern  kern_lock.c
>                sys/sys   lock.h
>   Log:
>   remove from HEAD, this is now in the LITE2 branch

The LITE2 branch should now be in a suitable condition for Doug's NFS work 
to be committed to the branch.

Doug? Is this convenient for you with the LITE2 tree being a week or two 
old?  Should I resync with -current first?

Cheers,
-Peter