From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Sep 11 10:34:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from arutam.inch.com (ns.inch.com [207.240.140.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC8B14E79 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 1999 10:34:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freyes@inch.com) Received: from tomasa (freyes.static.inch.com [207.240.212.43]) by arutam.inch.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/UTIL-INCH-2.0.0) with SMTP id NAA11914; Sat, 11 Sep 1999 13:34:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199909111734.NAA11914@arutam.inch.com> From: "Francisco Reyes" To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , "Laurence Berland" Cc: "advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG" Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 13:34:44 -0400 Reply-To: "Francisco Reyes" X-Mailer: PMMail 98 Professional (2.01.1600) For Windows 98 (4.10.1998) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: The new toolkit, does it help us to advocate FreeBSD? Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 10 Sep 1999 20:58:36 -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >> come out closer to the release of the CDs? (ie 3.3Toolkit and 3.3 >> closer together, not 3.3 toolkit a week before 3.4) > >Actually, we're doing our best to de-couple them from releases now >since the two don't get scheduled all that coincidently these days. :) Why not have the toolkits in the middle of the releaseas? This would be breat for those that want to follow stable, but not deal with cvsup or downloads. It will also boost revenuews at Walnut Creek since people may subscribe to both. If they releases were at the same or near time then people will commonly only choose one or the other. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message