From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul 31 17:59:19 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DC837B401
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5711543FE0
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com)
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.no-ip.com[66.30.200.37])
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP
          id <2003080100591701200bvce0e>; Fri, 1 Aug 2003 00:59:17 +0000
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [66.30.200.37]
	(may be forged))
	by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h710xGM1043455;
	Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:59:17 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com)
Received: (from lowell@localhost)
	by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h710xGZT043452;
	Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:59:16 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to
	freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f
Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com
To: Andrzej Kwiatkowski <kwiatek@tpi.pl>
References: <410-220037229204050796@M2W031.mail2web.com>
	<20030729224930.L7243@kwiatek.eu.org>
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com>
Date: 31 Jul 2003 20:59:16 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20030729224930.L7243@kwiatek.eu.org>
Message-ID: <44ispi19cr.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
Lines: 22
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ipfw ruleset question
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 00:59:19 -0000

Andrzej Kwiatkowski <kwiatek@tpi.pl> writes:

> I've got a bit strange problem..
> 
> My freeBSD works as NAT with natd.
> 
> Whene rule
> 
> divert 8668 ip from any to any via fxp0
> 
> is first everything is ok,but when i try to move this rule after some
> blocking spamer rules, my Nat won't work properly.
> 
> Incoming traffic is well nated, but outgoing looks like not nated.
> 
> sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass is set to 1.
> I try to set to 0 but nothings changed .
> 
> Have any Idea ??

Sounds like your spam-blocking rules include some packet-accepting
rules.  What does the ruleset look like?