From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 11 21:25:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637D516A419 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from smtp802.mail.ird.yahoo.com (smtp802.mail.ird.yahoo.com [217.146.188.62]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B30D813C4D5 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:25:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: (qmail 67628 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2008 21:25:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (thomasjudge@btinternet.com@86.140.145.126 with plain) by smtp802.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Jan 2008 21:25:39 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: CG7kYk8VM1mLpzbQhV2mPf9ju.pyCgW4PXNYhNKXePYxtp1j Message-ID: <4787D1AF.3090900@tomjudge.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:29:35 +0000 From: Tom Judge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (X11/20070824) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ticso@cicely.de References: <20080111140144.59498431.timo.schoeler@riscworks.net> <200801111917.m0BJHP8u018954@lurza.secnetix.de> <20080111211500.GD79270@cicely12.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20080111211500.GD79270@cicely12.cicely.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: timo.schoeler@riscworks.net, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD's problems as seen by the BSDForen.de community X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:25:43 -0000 Bernd Walter wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 08:17:25PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: >> Certainly, but as I wrote, it's not a big deal. I have >> several other patches that I maintain on my own for >> various reasons. For example I have a local patch set >> that enables "-c none" in ssh, so I can scp large files >> much faster between slow machines over channels that don't >> need encryption, and still be able to use ssh's features. >> I don't even try to submit the patch to the OpenSSH people, >> because they would reject it. I considered submitting it >> as a local patch to the FreeBSD base, but I think it would >> be rejected too, reason: "please submit it upstream to the >> OpenSSH people". :-) > > This is by far the best outcome from this branch of the thread. > I've often missed this feature in ssh since it was removed. > May I have your patch? > I have also have this patch (against RELENG_6_2) but it also includes the HPN patches, please drop me a private email if you would like a copy. Tom