From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 08:40:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A489416A4CE for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:40:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from postman.arcor.de (newsread1.arcor-online.net [151.189.0.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1C443D2D for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:40:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-51-138.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.51.138]) (authenticated bits=0)i2IGe7ck007668 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:40:07 +0100 (MET) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1B40Yg-0001sq-TN; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:39:50 +0100 Message-ID: <4059D0D6.2090807@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:39:50 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vman@tmok.com References: <4059B9E9.80802@fillmore-labs.com> <20040318150738.GA87118@k2.homeunix.net> <4059BD4E.7040803@fillmore-labs.com> <20040318152648.GA91776@k2.homeunix.net> <4059C4E1.5050009@fillmore-labs.com> <20040318160038.GA674@k2.homeunix.net> <4059CBEC.7040405@fillmore-labs.com> <20040318162457.GA36338@k2.homeunix.net> In-Reply-To: <20040318162457.GA36338@k2.homeunix.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/64415: make in ports stopped by ASCII GUI X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:40:09 -0000 Vlad Manilici wrote: > Hi Oliver, > >>Sofar, sogood. I guess it would be much clearer if we had a prototype >>patch to see clearly what you have in mind. Be aware though, that >>OPTIONS handling is not as easy as it seems. > > Well, most of the questions referred to building in some debug behaviour. > Plus a couple I did not really take the time to investigate. > > Would a fix for /etc/make.conf suit as a patch? Fixing all packets is > tremendous work, plus discussions with the maintainers... You can't patch /etc/make.conf, since it's not part of the FreeBSD distribution. I guess patching the ports would accomplish nothing, and normally we prefer if ports behave consistently. Whatever you had in mind, couldn't you just simply send the patch, so I can clearly see what you are trying to do? -Oliver