Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 18:27:06 -0700 From: Rick Macklem <rick.macklem@gmail.com> To: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net> Cc: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>, FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RFC: NFS over TLS stats Message-ID: <CAM5tNy488H-vqzsLvqvdqnD1Kqdehrh4zAxtEr1LsWz%2Bo=ru2Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAM5tNy7WDvEHnN=QC8fqbt5QyHC=DTmLBR-mz4ZogO5NJoWugQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAM5tNy4=ioUd3gRqwEr5-ss7jek1N7DWc-b4_c4xWWEe-5uQyg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOjFWZ5cyS8LWo19qH2gqCQmDfPR1%2Bmxr0iebPA0HSZ4SuTsPw@mail.gmail.com> <63874.1698283976@kaos.jnpr.net> <CAM5tNy54ZX_D5nKGTxdHhpmpchSv0MddQjNuhku3D2tM6mrh_g@mail.gmail.com> <48556.1698289785@kaos.jnpr.net> <CAM5tNy7WDvEHnN=QC8fqbt5QyHC=DTmLBR-mz4ZogO5NJoWugQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 11:28=E2=80=AFAM Rick Macklem <rick.macklem@gmail.c= om> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 8:10=E2=80=AFPM Simon J. Gerraty <sjg@juniper.net= > wrote: > > > > Rick Macklem <rick.macklem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > kern.rpctls.tls.snd_msgbytes: 20828 > > > > kern.rpctls.tls.snd_msgcnt: 57 > > > > kern.rpctls.tls.rcv_tmsgbytes: 12336 > > > > kern.rpctls.tls.rcv_msgcnt: 57 > > > > > > > > which allows for sysctl kern.rpctls.tls > > > Not sure what you mean? > > > > If for some reason I only care about tls I can do > > > > sysctl kern.rpctls.tls > > > > and get > > > > kern.rpctls.tls.snd_msgbytes: 20828 > > kern.rpctls.tls.snd_msgcnt: 57 > > kern.rpctls.tls.rcv_tmsgbytes: 12336 > > kern.rpctls.tls.rcv_msgcnt: 57 > > > > otherwise I'd have to do > > > > sysctl kern.rpctls | grep tls > > > > > I am listing counts for TLS and non-TLS so they can > > > be compared. As such, a "tls" in the last component of > > > the name is needed, unless I list the non-TLS ones > > > > Ok > > > > > under something else like: > > > kern.rpc.snd_msgbytes > > > > > > I currently actually have them all as: > > > kern.rpc.tls.XXX instead of kern.rpctls.XXX, > > > > Haha I didn't notice the tls in rpctls ;-) > > > > > since there was already kern.rpc.gss.XXX. > > > > kern.rpc.tls.XXX sounds fine > Ok, how does this look? > > kern.rpc.nontls.tx_msgcnt: 58 > kern.rpc.nontls.tx_msgbytes: 20828 > kern.rpc.nontls.rx_msgcnt: 58 > kern.rpc.nontls.rx_msgbytes: 12072 As suggested by someone off-list, I have replaced "nontls" with "unenc". rick > kern.rpc.tls.tx_msgcnt: 62639 > kern.rpc.tls.tx_msgbytes: 30800352 > kern.rpc.tls.rx_msgcnt: 62639 > kern.rpc.tls.rx_msgbytes: 13473756 > kern.rpc.tls.handshake_success: 1 > kern.rpc.tls.handshake_failed: 0 > kern.rpc.tls.alerts: 1 > > It doesn't put the nonTLS and TLS lines for a given stat next to each oth= er, > but does allow either the nonTLS or TLS stats to be displayed easily > and keeps the two sets adjacent, so they can be compared easily. > > rick > > > > > > > > > rick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAM5tNy488H-vqzsLvqvdqnD1Kqdehrh4zAxtEr1LsWz%2Bo=ru2Q>