From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Nov 28 21:38:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CF215493 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 1999 21:38:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by relay.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA15148; Sun, 28 Nov 1999 21:38:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 21:38:40 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Will Andrews Cc: "David O'Brien" , "Chris D. Faulhaber" , Bill Fumerola , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Ade Lovett Subject: Re: ports/15135: new port: devel/cervisia Message-ID: <19991128213840.J1371@relay.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@NUXI.com References: <19991128210537.A54056@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre1i In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 12:31:05AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > Right. The problem here is that the KDE and Qt port maintainers seem reluctant > to put the switch in the kdelibs11 and qt142 ports so that those ports will be > compiled using the newer g++.. required for certain aforementioned apps. > > I think the sooner, the better. Oh well if people have to recompile their > libraries with NEWGCC, right? :-) I agree. > The reason I asked about MFC'ing egcs 1.1.2 is because it would eliminate the > need to have USE_NEWGCC in the ports system. Yes. But of course that would require everyone to recompile their libs as much as useing NEWGCC would. :) -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message