From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 19 21:59:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: usb@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5D11065680; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sippysoft.com (gk1.360sip.com [72.236.70.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332658FC17; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.9] ([204.244.149.125]) (authenticated bits=0) by sippysoft.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m7JLxHAK079095 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:59:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <48AB4234.80502@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:59:16 -0700 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Sippy Software, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Watson References: <20080819194413.GB16977@elvis.mu.org> <48AB32D4.5040904@FreeBSD.org> <48AB3408.4030703@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: usb@FreeBSD.org, Alfred Perlstein , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP new usb code coming in. X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:59:19 -0000 Robert Watson wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >> Maxim Sobolev wrote: >>> Alfred Perlstein wrote: >>>> Q. Can we change the name from "usb2_" to my favorite name? A. No. >>>> This is for a short period, stop being so annoying. >>> >>> Why not just "usb_"? You can then leave it as is then avoiding >>> violating POLA second time. Otherwise people would confuse it with >>> USB 2.0. >> >> P.S. I am talking about entries for kernel config here, not about >> names of directories and source files. > > With the move to Subversion, there's a significantly lower technical > barrier to renaming files in the tree, especially if they exist only in > HEAD. Let's assume that, when the time comes to remove the old USB > implementation, we will do whatever renaming of directories, files, and > symbols that may make sense. That is to say, let's leave the names as-is > and focus on the semantics. See my other e-mail. I am talking about entries for kernel config here, not about names of directories and source files. -Maxim