Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 17:19:43 -0400 From: Christopher Weimann <cweimann@k12hq.com> To: William Ashworth <willybaby12345@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proper way to configure NIC in full duplex Message-ID: <20030409171943.C23012@mail.k12us.com> In-Reply-To: <028801c3126e$72111310$728d3a40@user>; from willybaby12345@yahoo.com on Sun, May 04, 2003 at 11:53:21AM -0700 References: <028801c3126e$72111310$728d3a40@user>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun 05/04/2003-11:53:21AM -0700, William Ashworth wrote:
>
> www# ifconfig rl0
> rl0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> inet 246.193.67.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 216.194.67.255
> inet6 fe80::248:54ff:fe3d:350%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
> inet 66.51.100.209 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 66.51.100.223
> inet 66.51.100.210 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 66.51.100.223
This doesn't relate to your question but you netmask is wrong on the
additional ip addresses. I believe they should be 0xffffffff on the
65.51.100.210 and higher addresses.
man ifconfig
alias Establish an additional network address for this interface. This
is sometimes useful when changing network numbers, and one wishes
to accept packets addressed to the old interface. If the address
is on the same subnet as the first network address for this
interface, a non-conflicting netmask must be given. Usually
0xffffffff is most appropriate.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030409171943.C23012>