Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 21:27:35 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 260011] Unresponsive NFS mount on AWS EFS Message-ID: <bug-260011-227-xP6ku6WDop@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-260011-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-260011-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D260011 Rick Macklem <rmacklem@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #234129|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #15 from Rick Macklem <rmacklem@FreeBSD.org> --- Created attachment 234164 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D234164&action= =3Dedit do not mark recovery needed after nfsrpc_renew() for BADSESSION This is a much simpler patch that might fix the problem you saw. I am not sure, but without this patch, the "NFSCLFLAGS_RECOVER" would be set twice when nfsrpc_renew() gets a NFSERR_BADSESSION error reply. I still can't see how that would cause two recovery cycles, but if it did, that would explain how a broken session might not be marked "defunct". The patch also adds a diagnostic printf() for the case where the broken session is not marked "defunct". The previous patch would not have been acceptable for a commit to FreeBSD. I will once more mention that "soft" mounts will never work correctly for NFSv4.1. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-260011-227-xP6ku6WDop>