From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 20 15:16:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BD716A4CF for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:16:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBEEE43D46 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:16:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mitigator@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 79so426703rnk for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:16:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=We/NqMRjKY3S2ySMlSiwUEVHxz8GWmOxgsya9EhTNxYtX/FeWjHwhzRWe84nn2LAkLj7OsUscv973S30BUrTV+C13jyCyLJ/x0ixOkfVWIgUn9ojbPXAFENIMrRHqlirmYxrYyfu62jwsEJeEpZNVUS45nW1YgS+jVnnKUdec70 Received: by 10.38.75.62 with SMTP id x62mr1460620rna; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:16:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.163.71 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:16:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6ff30abd04102008163115a32d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:16:56 -0500 From: jamie rishaw at google mail To: Maxim Sobolev In-Reply-To: <41767CF1.2020005@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <41767CF1.2020005@FreeBSD.org> cc: arch@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jamie rishaw at google mail List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:16:57 -0000 What are the performance implications of a debug kernel? Disk space really shouldnt even be an issue.. if it is, and its down to the difference of 20 megs, well, duno. 512 meg CF's going for sub-$50 .. the only reason i could see even a debate would be any significant performance hits..