From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 26 16:23: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from alcanet.com.au (border.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B10A15103 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 16:23:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au) Received: by border.alcanet.com.au id <40343>; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 09:20:09 +1000 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 09:22:51 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy Subject: EGCS, or EGCS? To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Message-Id: <99Sep27.092009est.40343@border.alcanet.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The recent thread about the GCC optimiser prompted me to go and have a look at gcc's behaviour. This has left me somewhat confused. I appear to have two complete copies of gcc - one in src/contrib/gcc and another in src/contrib/egcs/gcc. Both of them have README files stating that they are EGCS 1.1.2 - though there are substantial differences between them. Both src/contrib/gcc and src/contrib/egcs/gcc appear to be being updated along the -current tree. Looking at src/gnu/usr.bin/cc, it looks like src/contrib/egcs/gcc is being built - and this is backed up by the output from my regular buildworld's. Can anyone explain this? Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message