From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Oct 6 08:20:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA04616 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Tue, 6 Oct 1998 08:20:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA04604 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 1998 08:20:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.6) id JAA12418; Tue, 6 Oct 1998 09:20:31 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.1.19981006085422.04379a10@mail.lariat.org> X-Sender: brett@mail.lariat.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1998 08:55:45 -0600 To: Jerry Hicks , FreeBSD Chat From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: RMS on UDI In-Reply-To: <199810060403.AAA01636@remote.my.domain> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 12:03 AM 10/6/98 -0400, Jerry Hicks wrote: >So what is the attitude around FreeBSD toward UDI? Not the concept, which >nearly everyone agrees is a Good Thing, but this particular set of proposals >from SCO, Intel, et al. > >I'm more than a little paranoid about I20 and suspicious of UDI too... As well we should be. However, the UDI spec is being distributed for free, without a demand for large fees, and there really don't seem to be strings attached. It seems sort of like the AT&T ABI specs in this regard. If so, it's a Good Thing. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message