From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 5 15:23:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from chopper.Poohsticks.ORG (chopper.poohsticks.org [63.227.60.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0314B37B738 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 15:23:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drew@chopper.Poohsticks.ORG) Received: from chopper.Poohsticks.ORG (drew@localhost.poohsticks.org [127.0.0.1]) by chopper.Poohsticks.ORG (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f25NNQn26752; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 16:23:26 -0700 Message-Id: <200103052323.f25NNQn26752@chopper.Poohsticks.ORG> To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fixing flex definitions? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 05 Mar 2001 14:48:23 PST." <20010305144823.B8663@fw.wintelcom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <26748.983834606.1@chopper.Poohsticks.ORG> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 16:23:26 -0700 From: Drew Eckhardt Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20010305144823.B8663@fw.wintelcom.net>, bright@wintelcom.net writes : >Would this be an ok fix? I'm worried about the YY_PROTO() messing >things up anyone know what the point of doing it this way is? Compatability with pre-ANSI 'C' compilers, just like __P from /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message