Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 06:43:05 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> To: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check Message-ID: <65cf5e92-948e-4aff-857b-539cbae290b4@unixarea.de> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712102055060.22779@wonkity.com> References: <fb3d23c5-e32d-452a-a0c3-c3cb12340054@cloudzeeland.nl> <a66d1c33-e405-d9e8-d9c3-2738b5e66887@cloudzeeland.nl> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712080956580.41281@wonkity.com> <20171208180905.GA96560@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712081111070.41281@wonkity.com> <20171208193011.GA2203@c720-r314251> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712081511530.41281@wonkity.com> <20171208223849.GA2171@c720-r314251>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday, 11 December 2017 04:56:04 CET, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>=20=
wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
>> El d=C3=ADa viernes, diciembre 08, 2017 a las 03:13:02p. m. -0700,=20
>> Warren Block escribi=C3=B3:
>>
>>>> Hmm, why -d ${USER} if this is already known who I am from the
>>>> ~/.forward file location?
>>>
>>> Because as a sysadmin, then you can copy it to another user without
>>> having to edit it each time.
>>
>> Hmm, and why the sysadmin has to put in each copy the '-d ${USER}' when
>> he/she puts the copy in the ~/.forward file of the USER?
>
> Because it's a per-user setting? I don't know for a fact, but that's=20
> how I'd do it: make the solution as general as possible.
Warren, you have not got my point: Why specfying '-d ${USER}' is required=20
in a per user file in its HOME?
--=20
Sent from my Ubuntu phone
http://www.unixarea.de/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?65cf5e92-948e-4aff-857b-539cbae290b4>