From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 8 13:54:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D25106564A for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2008 13:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout4.freenet.de (mout4.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789CC8FC08 for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2008 13:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from [195.4.92.14] (helo=4.mx.freenet.de) by mout4.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #65) id 1KyoGc-00059h-Qv; Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:54:22 +0100 Received: from m8948.m.pppool.de ([89.49.137.72]:56514 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 4.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #68) id 1KyoGc-0005nD-Ad; Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:54:22 +0100 Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 14:54:21 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Chuck Robey Message-ID: <20081108145421.5c47c31c@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <0E1DCF36-07A1-4A7F-8784-477709445C26@telenix.org> References: <0E1DCF36-07A1-4A7F-8784-477709445C26@telenix.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new X11 project X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2008 13:54:25 -0000 On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:52:43 -0500 Chuck Robey wrote: > [This is my first time running this mail composing tool, tell me if > it's doing something evil I don't see, ok?] > > I just got pointed at a URL, if you haven't, it's most likely worth > your time to read this; > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=xorg_wayland&num=1 > I only briefly looked at this, but it seems like they want to pull ever more of the functionality of the X-server into the kernel. This is definitely the wrong approach and smacks of Microsoft type thinking to me. Simplifying user-land at the cost of greatly complicating the kernel is a giant step backwards. --- Gary Jennejohn