From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Feb 24 04:24:38 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA16560 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 04:24:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.ucdavis.edu [128.120.37.176]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA16551 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 04:24:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (reqd-041.ucdavis.edu [128.120.251.161]) by relay.nuxi.com (8.8.4/8.6.12) with ESMTP id EAA27678 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 04:26:13 -0800 (PST) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) id MAA10894; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 12:24:30 GMT Message-ID: <19970224042430.VP28336@dragon.nuxi.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 04:24:30 -0800 From: obrien@NUXI.com (David O'Brien) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org (FreeBSD ports list) Subject: Rxvt port X-Mailer: Mutt 0.60_p2-3,5,8-9 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Disclaimer: Mutt Bites! Organization: The NUXI *BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Has anyone been using the rxvt-2.16 port? Since upgrading to it from rxvt-2.09, I've been really frustrated with its handling of the erase character. I'm finding it impossible to get a configuration that works for both xterm and rxvt. Furthermore I have 2.19 and 2.20 compiling. Should I just upgrade this port? Note that with each release of rxvt, the maintainer keeps making gratutious changes to suit his [latest] personal tastes. Often with little reguard for previous look and feel. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org)