From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 7 21:40:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F0F61000 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 21:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29B031BC5 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 21:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s17Le1HY058124 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 21:40:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s17Le0Jq058123; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 21:40:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 21:40:00 GMT Message-Id: <201402072140.s17Le0Jq058123@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Benjamin Podszun Subject: Re: ports/186533: Update security/luasec to 0.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Benjamin Podszun List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 21:40:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/186533; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Benjamin Podszun To: David Thiel Cc: Subject: Re: ports/186533: Update security/luasec to 0.5 Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 22:34:12 +0100 On Friday, February 7, 2014 10:30:56 PM CEST, David Thiel wrote: > Just to check, this should remove the dependency on luasocket, correct? I .. am not sure. This links to the locally provided fork of luasocket (and=20= as I wrote elsewhere, according to the prosody people that very well might=20= be just one package in the future). But I haven't tested it without=20 luasocket, to be honest. Want me to give it a try? > Also, -L./luasocket should be -L${WRKSRC}/src/luasocket, I=E2=80=99ll chang= e > that in the commit. Makes a lot more sense. That's probably a relic from my 'getting it to=20 work' struggle. Thanks for looking into it! Ben