From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jun 29 15:43:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from gatekeeper.veriohosting.com (gatekeeper.veriohosting.com [192.41.0.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4821F37C216 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:43:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fred@veriohosting.com) Received: by gatekeeper.veriohosting.com; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:43:28 -0600 (MDT) Received: from unknown(192.168.1.7) by gatekeeper.veriohosting.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024795; Thu, 29 Jun 00 16:43:19 -0600 Received: from vespa.orem.iserver.com (vespa.orem.iserver.com [192.168.1.144]) by orca.orem.veriohosting.com [Verio Web Hosting, Inc. 801.437.0200] (8.8.8) id QAA68728 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:43:19 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:50:12 -0600 (MDT) From: Fred Clift X-Sender: fred@vespa.orem.iserver.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RBL/Sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > not because any spam had been actually relayed through them but because of > the potential for relaying using a technique that was not yet in any, let > alone wide-spread use for relaying. I might add that the machines got added to the list by someone trying to piss me off and waste my time. Fred -- Fred Clift - fred@clift.org -- Remember: If brute force doesn't work, you're just not using enough. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message