Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:48:28 +0200 From: Jonathan McKeown <j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Just wanted to install vim - had to spend entire day building X11 Message-ID: <201101101548.28941.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> In-Reply-To: <4D2B036B.40503@gmail.com> References: <AANLkTin_c0j9fbp-YMYx4mfdWsc4w3Zx5mgWB09mHbHC@mail.gmail.com> <xeiak4id6sbw.fsf@kobe.laptop> <4D2B036B.40503@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 10 January 2011 15:02:35 Ed Smith wrote: > This seems bizarre. Logically, it would seem better to do a split like > vim (bare vim - what you would expect) and xvim (vim with X11) similar > to how emacs does emacs/xemacs. Er, no. xemacs is a fork of emacs. emacs has X-related dependencies unless you make it WITHOUT_X11. Jonathan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201101101548.28941.j.mckeown>