Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 19:54:56 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: davidg@root.com Cc: terry@lambert.org, kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de, julian@freefall.freebsd.org, hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: why is this not a bug in namei? Message-ID: <199509190254.TAA09115@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199509182321.QAA03724@corbin.Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at Sep 18, 95 04:21:46 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> Is this just a typo? Shouldn't it be a FREE() macro like below? > ... > >The code should still be cleaned up, however. > > > >I prefer the macroized version to allow later instrumentation. > > I prefer the non macroized version. The instrumentation of malloc/free > belongs in malloc() & free(). Macros are ugly and usually evil. They > unnecessarily obscure the code. ??? What if I only want to instrument malloc() and free() in one source file? What if I want to share code with NetBSD and BSDI? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509190254.TAA09115>