Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:19:12 +0300 From: Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Policy routing idea (Was: ipfw: Would it be possible to continue processing rest of rules after match ?) Message-ID: <42BA8CA0.3070501@suutari.iki.fi> In-Reply-To: <20050623010618.B7580@xorpc.icir.org> References: <42B7B352.8040806@suutari.iki.fi> <42BA6A22.6030506@suutari.iki.fi> <20050623010618.B7580@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > BTW for the 'setnexthop', the port number does not really make > much sense... though it can be useful as a degenerate 'nexthop' case > to forward to a local port. Didn't remember to comment on this. I left the port number possibility there although it is really questionable if it is useful (I won't be needing it now). Ari S.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42BA8CA0.3070501>