From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 17 01:39:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65B816A41F for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:39:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mail2.fluidhosting.com [204.14.90.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1ED4043D5F for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:39:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 12921 invoked by uid 399); 17 Dec 2005 01:39:30 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Dec 2005 01:39:30 -0000 Message-ID: <43A36C4F.4010005@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:39:27 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu References: <43A33C0E.9050100@FreeBSD.org> <20051217000418.GC851@zaphod.nitro.dk> <43A35FA5.4050202@FreeBSD.org> <20051217031024.60912c94@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20051217031024.60912c94@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org, "Simon L. Nielsen" Subject: Re: Should etc/rc.d/ike move to ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:39:34 -0000 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > Better use: > USE_RC_SUBR= ike > and put the script in files/ike.in > > Currently this will perform some substitutions on the script (PREFEIX, > etc.) and install it as ike.sh Thanks for that, I wasn't aware that a .in vs. .sh.in was already working :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection