From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Oct 29 03:30:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BE4C26E54 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 03:30:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EF3D99D for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 03:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-205.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D93123D04E; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 05:30:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u9T3UZx5003284; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 05:30:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 05:30:35 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Allen Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LAME Package Question Message-Id: <20161029053035.7801824a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20161028213914.0876d1cf@KoggyBSD.org> References: <20161028213914.0876d1cf@KoggyBSD.org> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 03:30:46 -0000 On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 21:39:14 -0400, Allen wrote: > I'm running FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-P35 > > I've been thinking about upgrading anyway, but one of the things I'm > seeing is that when I run pkg to do either installs or updates, before > it does anything it tells me that LAME is missing, and I originally > tried to just pkg install lame the thing, but it doesn't have that, and > I'm just wondering what the best way to get LAME installed would be. As far as I remember, installing LAME from source is the only "official" way to install it. Due to certain restrictions, this port cannot be packaged (and therefore no official package is available for use with the "pkg install" command). As you can see from https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/audio/lame/ the port has set the RESTRICTED option - it cannot be packaged. > I generally use the PKG tool and installs actual Packages, as I've > already paid my dues dealing with the Ports Collection back when I > first started using FreeBSD back in the 4.0-RELEASE days, and even > though I do like the whole idea of the Ports Collection, and I do use > it, I'm trying to stick to just one System of Installing Software on > this machine, but I want to install LAME, and can't seem to with the > usual methods, and before I go poking through the Ports Collection, is > there a way to install LAME using a Package? Or...? When you're not using non-default port options, "make install" for this port should be fine. Note that pkg won't upgrade it, so you'd have to do this yourself (update ports tree, followed by "make deinstall" and "make reinstall"). There might be alternatives: "toolame" and "twolame" are present in the ports collection. They probably have packages available. Maybe you can use one of them to replace "lame"? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...