From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 11 00:22:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A692D106566C; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:22:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maho.nakata@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f45.google.com (mail-pw0-f45.google.com [209.85.160.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713D58FC08; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:22:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so10680pwi.18 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:22:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:date:message-id:to:cc:subject:from :in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6CrB47E+2AtGdvf/1bADBmJKcaR/Hpp9BQRTr0N3v5g=; b=nK4pN5ZSz+pvvEYkobRsuiNfsevxTZriK/pBEYlAQBQmQCTgs236dSDi2b+dFymApk oJ81pAH36gCW07A747Fe9uAslOjSXGzRH+za46NH/8cQujfJA4GUyQb9kq5mfTXpBMts I43NwFOYU8qBpLtwqQpFqc07JS88xqynPtrVc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:message-id:to:cc:subject:from:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=C4ot9bja9G1kT5y0ZWs2U5wf+rfInurLgqUoKLdjMY3sNjtiUrhqWBkmUDgx6w2jqC hcKk+RW7Ag2OHIY+H0BZftM6eEH+D+0h+H1kk8TMPjTKLpEh8B2g57qrYSAAoxvkeNJl qYOYWr6h0DoiDpEyPYZbfkVD0gWVVWaSnl3rw= Received: by 10.68.39.72 with SMTP id n8mr8412120pbk.93.1305071620949; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:53:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (rikad42.riken.jp [134.160.214.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c4sm1119098pbn.37.2011.05.10.16.53.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 May 2011 16:53:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Maho NAKATA Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 08:53:35 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20110511.085335.1840459916094859253.chat95@mac.com> To: stephen@missouri.edu From: Maho NAKATA In-Reply-To: <4DC937FE.7090602@missouri.edu> References: <4DC937FE.7090602@missouri.edu> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, koziol@hdfgroup.org, thierry@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why so many versions of the port science/hdf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 00:22:14 -0000 Hi Stephen, As the maintainer of octave port, if hdf5-18 is sufficient, it's okay to replace with it. Thanks, Nakata Maho From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Subject: Why so many versions of the port science/hdf? Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 08:05:02 -0500 > Why are there three versions of science/hdf in the ports? > > This is causing problems for me when I try to build the port > octave-forge. As dependencies, it calls in the octave port (which > currently defaults to hdf5), the cgnslib port (which uses hdf5-18), > and the opendx port (which uses hdf). All of these ports function > perfectly well with hdf5.18, because all the different versions of hdf > conflict with each other. > > If we could settle on using hdf5-18 throughout, that would be great. > (I currently maintain opendx, so that would be something I can fix.) > > Are there ports that need hdf but don't build with hdf5-18? > > Thanks, Stephen >