From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 12 18:51:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2444016A4CE; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:51:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from postman.arcor.de (newsread1.arcor-online.net [151.189.0.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A02C43D2D; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:51:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-51-138.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.51.138]) (authenticated bits=0)i2D2pick028534 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 13 Mar 2004 03:51:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1B1zFV-000AXg-VO; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 03:51:42 +0100 Message-ID: <4052773D.5010507@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 03:51:41 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maho Nakata References: <200403130236.i2D2atOx068933@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200403130236.i2D2atOx068933@repoman.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors/openoffice-1.1 Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 02:51:47 -0000 Maho Nakata wrote: > maho 2004/03/12 18:36:55 PST > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > editors/openoffice-1.1 Makefile > Log: > COMMENT is always defined. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.130 +0 -2 ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/Makefile I guess you just borked the comments of the lang/openoffice-1.1 ports. Wouldn't it be better to come up with a patch and port it for review, than using the FreeBSD CVS for development?