From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 23 20:37:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB85016A407 for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:37:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A051413C457 for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:37:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so3012765wxc for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:37:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ek3dE8k/Om1+JYXo7PU9kw1mNGx+ZSsS4hsjj0vpudK8GWIa44VxW8UvNRxx/rHepE1gcqjdKXxZzTrlwu5lOodFipiZyQfeBNMIilslLhPeFoxM/Xmvsaq2+5/2pP83iLxjNp5cCYLu13O6e1+phKn121wXZnSOf92Ndq98ZJE= Received: by 10.70.32.13 with SMTP id f13mr19034572wxf.1166906267054; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:37:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.14.20 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:37:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <14989d6e0612231237o6e1aef57u3f44bb3cc42f1e35@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:37:46 +0100 From: "Christian Walther" To: "Michael P. Soulier" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <499c70c0612231016i2007f7cvd871030f2225f69d@mail.gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: FF 2.0 hogging the cpu in FreeBSD 6.2-PRELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:37:50 -0000 On 23/12/06, Michael P. Soulier wrote: [...] > Firefox is a pig on every platform. Plus, more sites are using > javascript for AJAX these days, pushing more and more load onto the > client. I agree. It's painfull to see that you browse a website and it consumes all your cpu cycles eventually. Since most of these scripts are used to power adverts or some graphical stuff that really isn't necessary, I use FF with the Adblock, NoScript, and Flashblock-Extension. Adblock filters known ads, together with "Adblock Filter.G Updater" you get a decent list of ad placing sites. NoScript is configured to block all JavaScripts by default, and if I think that a website doesn't behave as I would expect (e.g. doesn't react on URL- oder buttonpresses in forms), I temporarily allow scripts for this site. Sites I visit regularly that require JavaScript get general permission. Flashblock teaches embedded Flash-Objects "on demand"-behaviour by replacing them with a play button. The Animation is only started after this button is being pressed. This puts an end to high CPU load...