Date: 30 Apr 2000 23:48:53 -0700 From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: "Kevin M. Dulzo" <kdulzo@caffeine.gerp.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xpm & XFree86-4 Message-ID: <vqcln1upxyi.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: "Kevin M. Dulzo"'s message of "Sat, 29 Apr 2000 13:02:50 -0500" References: <Pine.NEB.3.96.1000427134723.53623A-100000@shell-1.enteract.com> <vqcd7n9qmke.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20000429130249.A24123@caffeine.gerp.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: "Kevin M. Dulzo" <kdulzo@caffeine.gerp.org> * > What is the "dependency not found issue when using Xpm based ports * > with XFree86-4"? * > * This would be in regards to deinstalling the ports, they retain * the @pkgdep for xpm. They do build just fine. I see. I'm afraid you just need to wait just a little longer then. I don't think we need to add another knob for a problem that will go away by itself soon. * > We're planning to switch to XFree86-4 for everything except for * > servers soon. So hopefully this will be a non-issue. * > * In that case, I wouldn't mind, but would not the reverse seem * prudent. I know there are still y server works in 3.3.6 and not 4 and z * server workds in 4 and not 3.3.6, wouldn't a USE_X336 type of deal be * convenient then? Sorry, didn't mean to say that servers will be 3.x only. There will be 3.x and 4.0 servers (which the user can choose from), with 4.0 libs etc. * > that's exactly what it means. I doubt people with * > ALWAYS_BUILD_DEPENDS would appreciate all their USE_XLIB ports * > suddenly taking hours to compile.... * * I think somehow out of context it makes more sense... =) Hopefully this will go away too, when we manage to split up the XFree86 port to make it a "true" dependency. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqcln1upxyi.fsf>