From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 13 17:02:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E98106564A for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:02:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seanbru@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.253.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A9B8FC1B for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (rideseveral.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.160.231]) by mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p8DGpacv046422; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:51:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1315932696; bh=y3rONkerixkDp55i7LbHtn+5hA5l8jNuV7BU1QkK+lY=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-ID:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Os8str133W4+DUHND9i9G8VPb+FLXtyxBC4X3tgTs8yVTie7Ip1ZpZFgJA+CmV9Eh Cw37j1kq5ZfSNFj9plMffRPIYyazm/oSGfQIyGfkJL4ZQSYmiWYxnraNpNIDhaYbq2 Me33XwVtGZJ90KH/qwJsCNjB71FMnL0Cs+1IdHBg= From: Sean Bruno To: "Justin T. Gibbs" In-Reply-To: <4E6E978C.5060608@scsiguy.com> References: <4E6E978C.5060608@scsiguy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:51:35 -0700 Message-ID: <1315932695.3217.0.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: [CFT][PATCH] Netfront fixes for FreeBSD-head X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:02:01 -0000 On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 16:36 -0700, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > Folks, > > I'm planning to ask RE for permission to merge the following netfront > fixes (listed below) into 9.0/head. Before I do so, I'd appreciate some > community testing on the proposed patch set (attached). The main areas > of concern are: > > o TSO/LRO and performance > o Compatibility with NetBSD and other Dom0s that lack sg or TSO/LRO > support. > o Compatibility with configurations enabling ioemu on an interface. > > Thanks, > Justin Should these be applied with the suspend/resume enhancements? Sean