From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org  Thu Sep 29 15:55:49 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7F7C02D65
 for <freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:55:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org)
Received: from mail.turbocat.net (heidi.turbocat.net [88.198.202.214])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3891F30B
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:55:48 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from hps@selasky.org)
Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (unknown [62.141.129.119])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 927C81FE022;
 Thu, 29 Sep 2016 17:55:46 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Logitech G510s keyboard fail.
To: Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com>
References: <CACpH0Mc7GLk+ggA3_A_8O_MX5fi+-YtFfp-1GUTkOum12Omahg@mail.gmail.com>
 <f83acf52-0fa2-cf50-afaa-9eb6b74a832c@selasky.org>
 <CAF6rxg==viV5MpsxnOVKE5-mcR2CJmkpRjZuGCYEjJXmXHHZ7w@mail.gmail.com>
 <ec4139de-6765-a476-e6d0-0f6e0c1f4724@selasky.org>
 <CACpH0MfZ=NJ+16m7SVQPrRLRvMcLpWP56x0TSdbBBJb6aqg6ag@mail.gmail.com>
 <4300eab5-dafb-bce6-5b58-24d347202e23@selasky.org>
 <CACpH0Mfg1quviqvTs39sZ1AobXJNfA04azGonc-R8zkwkd98og@mail.gmail.com>
 <d167a6fc-c31c-49a1-4e66-ba2623296d63@selasky.org>
 <83c6aa1c-59a2-f96a-6841-e8b37801a966@selasky.org>
 <CACpH0Md11kwYAvyC8+Qtjn3S86A65o3dKtp6sXySuM-ghCJbNw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>,
 FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>
Message-ID: <27a9b9f1-27e3-8fd8-13e2-57ef45888342@selasky.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 18:00:38 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACpH0Md11kwYAvyC8+Qtjn3S86A65o3dKtp6sXySuM-ghCJbNw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:55:49 -0000

On 09/29/16 17:52, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> In this case, 10 bits (1024) would seem right.  16 bits would seem a good
> use of bits.  If I were to develop a patch along the lines of 10 or 16
> bits, is there a good chance it would be adopted?
>

It is the opposite. 1024 bits. One bit for every possible key press, so 
that you can press multiple keys at the same time.

--HPS