From owner-freebsd-current  Sun May  9 19:15:37 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from alcanet.com.au (border.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6CF152B5
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun,  9 May 1999 19:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from peter.jeremy@auss2.alcatel.com.au)
Received: by border.alcanet.com.au id <40548>; Mon, 10 May 1999 12:00:30 +1000
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 12:15:09 +1000
From: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@auss2.alcatel.com.au>
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: config(8) changes..
To: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Message-Id: <99May10.120030est.40548@border.alcanet.com.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> wrote:
>If you had old "vector xxxintr", it will now cause a syntax error rather than
>a warning.

What is the new method of specifying a non-standard interrupt
function?  I have some code (currently on 2.x, but I was hoping to be
able to move it) where I have different interrupt functions within the
same driver.  I could use a single interrupt handler, but it would
mean either additional latency or overhead, which I'd like to avoid.

Peter


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message