From owner-freebsd-bugs  Wed Sep 17 05:50:04 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id FAA09354
          for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 17 Sep 1997 05:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id FAA09346;
          Wed, 17 Sep 1997 05:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 05:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199709171250.FAA09346@hub.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs
Cc: 
From: Matthew Hunt <hunt@mph124.rh.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: misc/4556: make can't build executable from single Fortran source
Reply-To: Matthew Hunt <hunt@mph124.rh.psu.edu>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

The following reply was made to PR misc/4556; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Matthew Hunt <hunt@mph124.rh.psu.edu>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: misc/4556: make can't build executable from single Fortran source
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 08:40:25 -0400

 On Wed, Sep 17, 1997 at 07:39:37PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
 
 > The first one is hidden inside a %POSIX ifdef.
 
 Ah, yes.  Actually, the two I posted are both inside the ifdef, but
 in the else clause, there's:
 
 .e.o .r.o .F.o .f.o:
         ${FC} ${RFLAGS} ${EFLAGS} ${FFLAGS} -c ${.IMPSRC}
 
 Thanks for clearing that up, I should have noticed it myself.  So
 I guess my question now is, should there be a rule like:
 
 .f:
         ${FC} ${FFLAGS} ${LDFLAGS} -o ${.TARGET} ${.IMPSRC}
 
 in the non-Posix ruleset?
 
 -- 
 Matthew Hunt <mph@pobox.com> * Think locally, act globally.
 finger hunt@mph124.rh.psu.edu for PGP public key.