From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 20:11:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFE216A40F; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:11:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95C843CA1; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:10:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id kBFKBmfO020796; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:11:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:11:48 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Peter Edwards In-Reply-To: <34cb7c840612151000s4a3e1f2dvd71a60d66cf7c4be@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <34cb7c840612151000s4a3e1f2dvd71a60d66cf7c4be@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-ID: Content-Disposition: inline X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]); Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:11:48 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpthread problem + possible solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:11:50 -0000 On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Peter Edwards wrote: > Hi, > > I've a problem when a process uses: > libpthread > detached threads > mixed bound/unbound threads > suspended threads (a la pthread_resume_np()) > > whereby some newly created suspended threads don't get scheduled. > I think I've tracked it down, so if someone could review the > reasoning, I'd be grateful. I'm away for a few days, so I'd appreciate you waiting until early next week -- unless David Xu looks at it and gives it the ok. -- DE