From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Jan 24 22:43:57 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA12329
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 22:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dtr.com ([204.119.17.51])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA12199
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 22:42:26 -0800 (PST)
From: bmk@dtr.com
Received: (from bmk@localhost) by dtr.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id WAA09985; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 22:40:11 -0800
Message-Id: <199601250640.WAA09985@dtr.com>
Subject: Re: NEC changer
To: rich@lamprey.utmb.edu
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 22:40:11 -0800 (PST)
Cc: bmk@dtr.com, freebsd@hopf.math.purdue.edu, brantk@atlas.com,
        current@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199601250516.XAA03317@rich.isdn.bcm.tmc.edu> from "Rich Murphey" at Jan 24, 96 11:16:18 pm
Reply-To: bmk@dtr.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


> |From: bmk@dtr.com
> |I can't comment authoritatively on the changes required to get the
> |unit to work under -current, as the patches in question are for
> |2.1-RELEASE.  I don't run current - I have looked at the scsiconf.c
> |in yesterday's -current, and a lot has changed since 2.1.  None of the
> |line numbers match up.

> Are we talking about the Nakamichi changer? (NRC rather
> than NEC?)

Both.  The NEC apparently is functionally identical to the Nakamichi.