From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 10 16:30:12 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6423737B401; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6D10F43FA3; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com)
Received: from pcnet1.pcnet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.8/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h3ANU2Bg004795;
	Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:30:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (eischen@localhost)h3ANU1Rr004791;
	Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:30:01 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:30:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304101613360.90002-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304101928290.4545-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Subject: KSE signals (was RE: cvs commit: src/sys/ddb db_ps.csrc/sys/i386/i386
 genassym.c)
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:30:12 -0000

On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > There is NO support for locking a KSE to a CPU yet. That is a completely
> > > > > different question.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > There is in ULE.
> > >
> > > But you keep your own information on this..
> > 
> > Yes, I'm telling you, if you add anything make it specific to the
> > scheduler.  It doesn't not need to be in scheduler independant code.  We
> > just need a new system call for binding a kse to a cpu.  This will be
> > scheduler independant and then we can call a scheduler dependant routine
> > like sched_bind(kse, cpu);
> 
> exactly my thought.

This is all good stuff, but can we fix KSE signals first please?
Pretty please???

-- 
Dan Eischen