From owner-cvs-all Mon Apr 9 2:16:21 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [209.152.133.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BAC37B423; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 02:16:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f399GE113744; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 02:16:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 02:15:50 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/rsync/files ssh-patch-main.c ssh-patch-rsync.h Message-ID: <20010409021549.B11617@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org References: <200104081548.f38FmTf80209@freefall.freebsd.org> <3AD17CBB.4598E8B@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AD17CBB.4598E8B@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 12:11:23PM +0300 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 12:11:23PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Modified files: > > net/rsync/files ssh-patch-rsync.h > > Added files: > > net/rsync/files ssh-patch-main.c > > Isn't patchfile should begin with "patch-" prefix? What is the reason here for > breaking good (and very reasonable, IMO) convention for patchnames? We only want to apply these patches if SSH is in the base system. So these are added to EXTRA_PATCHES if so. If these patches were named "patch-*" they would unconditionally be applied. See ports/net/rsync/Makefile for the details. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message