From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Oct 31 23:13:59 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id XAA27656
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 23:13:59 -0800
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA27645
          ; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 23:13:57 -0800
Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id XAA21794; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 23:13:13 -0800
From: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199511010713.XAA21794@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.1 update
To: vince@apollo.COSC.GOV (-Vince-)
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 23:13:13 +1600 (PST)
Cc: jc@irbs.com, current@FreeBSD.org, FAQ@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951031212306.944Y@apollo.COSC.GOV> from "-Vince-" at Oct 31, 95 09:24:02 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 834       
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> On Tue, 31 Oct 1995, John Capo wrote:
> 
> 	I'll take a look at that so I don't really need to reinstall from
> floppies?  Isn't the -current tree supposed to be newer than the -stable 
> tree and will the -current tree become atleast 2.1?
 think of it this way:

                                                   /---->2.1  /->2.2
                                                  /          /
1.0---->1.1---->1.1.5->X   /---->2.0---->2.0.5---+----------+-->?
                       ----                            ^ 
  BSD4.4--------------/                                |              
                                                       |
                                                 -current is presently HERE
I'm not sure if the next 'stabel'
release will be based on 2.1 or 2.2
but I draw it as being 2.2 here