From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 29 11:03:09 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE183D5A
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:03:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75CE21F2F
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:03:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wiun10 with SMTP id n10so61280860wiu.1
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 04:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
 :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent;
 bh=l30AQ5LqqOib45nqqvkNXu6H7rQrOgVFGu58+cGdh2I=;
 b=lm31zm3HLglbkVvdIOt/rFvq3CPkOJQeQWc2LpvtkCYd1pFDU87H6PclJWbi+qFcZG
 e+LVeboEkTeaDGiQi4Pr+2asOdMsiVsS+Vu3zFbfIJVeXnfBNHLUBa9fA5a4eRMuTeh8
 afO6X/fJ7faq0k/p4zR4y8BMIy6hhtgDwM0dv6XnFOmn55/DlnlA3za/fwcBpXs/ZmMX
 l9xMmhCi6jK70Ae0Hn90Bf/55N2YjTqGBq54XPs8AErqBty8Ln13WkWTxPPn0yJter8c
 BegjR6gHTcC6MMulWeBSkWWDWARSmG2rMDazwGMnZKGtjjun6B6K1frhSWfPSmvw09Wu
 1OpQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.82.133 with SMTP id i5mr4713971wiy.23.1430305387977;
 Wed, 29 Apr 2015 04:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brick.home (eid109.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl. [83.21.119.109])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o6sm20668010wiz.24.2015.04.29.04.03.06
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 29 Apr 2015 04:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= <etnapierala@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:03:04 +0200
From: Edward Tomasz =?utf-8?Q?Napiera=C5=82a?= <trasz@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Enabling RACCT/RCTL in GENERIC.
Message-ID: <20150429110304.GA3377@brick.home>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:03:10 -0000

Hi.  With the patch I've just committed, the cost of compiling with RACCT
and RCTL is just a subroutine call and an unlocked variable check, in a few
places.  I'd like to add "options RACCT", "options RCTL", and "options
RACCT_DISABLED", to GENERIC on amd64, and MFC it before 10.2.  What do you
think?  Thanks!