From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 24 23:25:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.broadpark.no (217-13-4-9.dd.nextgentel.com [217.13.4.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A2737B404 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 23:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDCC7DA3 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:25:43 +0200 (MEST) Received: from 217.13.29.51 ( [217.13.29.51]) as user johann@mail.broadpark.no by mail.broadpark.no with HTTP; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:25:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1019715943.3cc7a167818b7@mail.broadpark.no> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:25:43 +0200 From: johann@broadpark.no To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: ARCH, PRCS or CVS instead of RCS? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1;q=1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.0 X-Originating-IP: 217.13.29.51 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi. I've been using RCS to keep track of my configuration files etc. for a while now. Unfortunately, I am missing some options. Like a global and central repository for both my machines, which are easily backed up daily and so on. I've stumbled across ARCH and PRCS in /usr/ports/devel, and I was wondering if anyone could recommend either one of those two as an easier alternative to CVS, which again is an alternative to RCS. Thanks. -- Johann To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message