From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Mar 14 8:10:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from blueyonder.co.uk (pcow035o.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.53.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532EA37B71A for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 08:10:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adnw32200@blueyonder.co.uk) Received: from john ([213.48.244.207]) by blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Wed, 14 Mar 2001 16:12:35 +0000 Message-ID: <000901c0aca1$68cdbe00$cff430d5@john> Reply-To: "John Dyer" From: "John Dyer" To: Subject: Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 16:11:17 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0ACA1.66931040" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0ACA1.66931040 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My name is John Dyer. For the last 13 years I have been researching the = alleged illegal disposal/dumping of a nuclear reactor/testing cell by Shell, at its Thornton research Centre, = in 1968. Briefly my research is that: 1. In 1968, Shell, hired known criminals (with a history of illegally = disposing of nuclear 'waste'), to decommission its (secret) nuclear rector/testing cell. 2. That Shell paid the said 'criminals' a six-figure CASH sun (at = today's prices). 3. That Shell's reactor/testing cell decommissioning did not go to plan. 4. That huge amounts of nuclear materials/waste (thousands of tons) = was./were illegally dumped (onto an urban population), as part, consequence. In 1993, following five years of research, my findings resulted in the = commissioning of a TV programme for Carlton Television (UK national broadcaster)-. A matter of days before the programmes proposed = transmission Shell produced a 2900 word Narrative*, to explain away my allegations/research. The said Narrative resulted in the = TV programme being abandoned- Shell claimed that 'I had got it wrong, for it was not a nuclear reactor/testing cell that had = been decommissioned, rather, Shell claimed, it was a cobalt-60 labyrinth- i.e., 'harmless' nuclear facility/waste'- this = (Shell's Narrative) was/is an absolute/deliberate known lie. *See http://www.nuclearcrimes.com/narrative.htm However, I have (now) established that the Shell's Native was a (known) = tissue of lies from start to finish. Such is my evidence that Shell's legal head (Richard Max Wiseman), was wheeled forward to = concede that Shell's said Narrative was a 'mistake'. As I state, - see www.nuclearcrimes.com Shell's Narrative/defence was no = 'mistake' rather, it was a deliberate known, fraudulent sham Narrative to cover up Shell's wholesale nuclear dumping crimes. = Shell-following two years of correspondence with senior Shell directors- its Chairman and Legal Head- threatened/'would not = hesitate' to sue me. Despite Shell's specific prior threats to sue, it has refused to issue, or embark on any legal process.Shell, = aware of the truth* will not risk court action, hence no writs' despite its issued threats. *See http://www.nuclearcrimes.com/new_page_23.htm In response to my WEB site, Shell has now called in its scientific = staff, and others, at Thornton Research Centre, Cheshire.Refusing to refute the allegations, the Group repeats the line = (lie) that I have refused to call in the 'Health & Safety'. Shell have used its muscle once to get my site shut down-see = http://www.nuclearcrimes.com/ site-now after threatening, my new' ethical web host, and failing to get 'him' to close down my site, = Shell is presently endeavouring to get the entire domain closed. Shell's lawyers latest- www.nuclearcrimes.com/shell_'challenge'.htm ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0ACA1.66931040 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
My name is John Dyer. For the last 13 = years I have=20 been researching the alleged illegal disposal/dumping of a
nuclear=20 reactor/testing cell by Shell, at its Thornton research Centre, in 1968. = Briefly=20 my research is that:

1. In 1968, Shell, hired known criminals = (with a=20 history of illegally disposing of nuclear 'waste'), to decommission its=20 (secret)
nuclear rector/testing cell.

2. That Shell paid the = said=20 'criminals' a six-figure CASH sun (at today's prices).

3. That = Shell's=20 reactor/testing cell decommissioning did not go to plan.

4. That = huge=20 amounts of nuclear materials/waste (thousands of tons) was./were = illegally=20 dumped (onto an urban population), as
part, consequence.

In = 1993,=20 following five years of research, my findings resulted in the = commissioning of a=20 TV programme for Carlton Television (UK
national broadcaster)-. A = matter of=20 days before the programmes proposed transmission Shell produced a 2900 = word=20 Narrative*, to
explain away my allegations/research. The said = Narrative=20 resulted in the TV programme being abandoned- Shell claimed that 'I = had
got=20 it wrong, for it was not a nuclear reactor/testing cell that had been=20 decommissioned, rather, Shell claimed, it was a
cobalt-60 labyrinth- = i.e.,=20 'harmless' nuclear facility/waste'- this (Shell's Narrative) was/is an=20 absolute/deliberate known lie.
*See http://www.nuclearcri= mes.com/narrative.htm

However,=20 I have (now) established that the Shell's Native was a (known) tissue of = lies=20 from start to finish. Such is my evidence
that Shell's legal head = (Richard=20 Max Wiseman), was wheeled forward to concede that Shell's said Narrative = was a=20 'mistake'.

As I state, - see www.nuclearcrimes.com Shell's=20 Narrative/defence was no 'mistake' rather, it was a deliberate known,=20 fraudulent
sham Narrative to cover up Shell's wholesale nuclear = dumping=20 crimes.  Shell-following two years of correspondence with = senior
Shell=20 directors- its Chairman and Legal Head- threatened/'would not hesitate' = to sue=20 me. Despite Shell's specific prior threats to
sue, it has refused to = issue,=20 or embark on any legal process.Shell, aware of the truth* will not risk = court=20 action, hence no
writs' despite its issued threats.
*See http://www.nuclearc= rimes.com/new_page_23.htm

In=20 response to my WEB site, Shell has now called in its scientific staff, = and=20 others, at Thornton Research Centre,
Cheshire.Refusing to refute the=20 allegations, the Group repeats the line (lie) that I have refused to = call in the=20 'Health &
Safety'. Shell have used its muscle once to get my site = shut=20 down-see http://www.nuclearcrimes.com/ = site-now=20 after threatening, my
new' ethical web host, and failing to get 'him' = to=20 close down my site, Shell is presently endeavouring to get the entire=20 domain
closed.

Shell's lawyers latest- www.nuclearcr= imes.com/shell_'challenge'.htm

------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0ACA1.66931040-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message