From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 21 07:37:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A7B16A4CF; Fri, 21 May 2004 07:37:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5093B43D3F; Fri, 21 May 2004 07:37:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061C61DD59F; Fri, 21 May 2004 16:36:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([193.2.4.66]) by localhost (niobe.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 88458-16; Fri, 21 May 2004 16:36:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rincewind.ijs.si (rincewind.ijs.si [193.2.4.137]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79EF1DD59A; Fri, 21 May 2004 16:36:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Dejan Lesjak To: x11@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 16:36:55 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040521022211.81086.qmail@web13423.mail.yahoo.com> <20040521091011.GA67611@arved.at> In-Reply-To: <20040521091011.GA67611@arved.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200405211636.55228.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new / Sophos+Sophie at ijs.si cc: "Pedro F. Giffuni" cc: Tilman Linneweh Subject: Re: XFree86 4.4 port ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 14:37:37 -0000 On Friday 21 of May 2004 11:10, Tilman Linneweh wrote: > * "Pedro F. Giffuni" [Fr, 21 Mai 2004 at 04:22 GMT]: > > I appreciate the great work that has been done lately to support the > > X.org server, but I recall there was a working port of Xfree86 4.4. Any > > *technical* reason why it hasn't been committed? > > Hi, thanks for raising this discussion, From my testing, I think there > are no technical reasons, that it can not be committed within 24 hours. > > It looks like Eric is busy with the X.org ports and not very interested in/ > too busy for XFree86 4.4. > I am interested in getting XFree86 4.4 into the tree, but I am not sure, > that I will have the time and the skills to deal with the upcoming > support requests. > > What do the others think (Dejan?) I'd be happy to see this commited. I'm also not sure how far my time and especially skills will go, but I can certainly try to help with support requests. Dejan