From owner-freebsd-isp  Tue Apr 22 11:33:57 1997
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA01377
          for isp-outgoing; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 11:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Fe3.rust.net (Fe3.rust.net [204.157.12.254])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA01372
          for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 11:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from danlaw1 (liv-51.rust.net [206.42.195.151])
          by Fe3.rust.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA06283;
          Tue, 22 Apr 1997 14:33:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <335D044A.60DC@rust.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 14:32:42 -0400
From: Sysadmin <danlaw@rust.net>
Reply-To: danlaw@rust.net
Organization: Danlaw, Incorporated
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Damian Hamill <damian@cablenet.net>
CC: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: News...
References: <199704181657.JAA02594@root.com> <3357C27A.63DECDAD@cablenet.net> <3357F448.34A9@rust.net> <335CA624.167EB0E7@cablenet.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Damian Hamill wrote:
> 
> Sysadmin wrote:
> >
> > Damian Hamill wrote:
> > >
> 
> > > There just isn't enough bandwidth... ever...
You wrote this bandwidth quote, right?

> > True.  As the internet evolves the customer will be using it and the
> > bandwidth they buy from you more completely.  But will next month's
> > debate be over CU-Seeme (sp?), RealVideo, Push technology, or fully
> > utilized PPP connections caused by someone's new program to stop long
> > transfers during web browsing, so that http can still take place at
> > full speed as well?  How to forbid, suppress, or eliminate such
> > advances in technology as menaces to ISP profits, and yet somehow be
> > able to present less services as "better service"?
The above was my response, was that not clear?
> 
> I didn't write this, I wrote the "isn't enough bandwidth... ever.."
> line.
This part confuses me.

> 
> Please make sure you attribute the correct quotes to the correct people.
Thought I did, unless this was not addressed to me.