From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jul 24 07:39:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA16867 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 07:39:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from george.lbl.gov (george-2.lbl.gov [131.243.2.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA16861; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 07:39:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jin@george.lbl.gov) Received: (from jin@localhost) by george.lbl.gov (8.8.8/LBL-ITG) id HAA07186; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 07:38:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 07:38:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Jin Guojun (ITG staff) Message-Id: <199807241438.HAA07186@george.lbl.gov> To: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no, delaroca@ucla.edu Subject: Re: RSH in 2.2.7 appears to be broken!!! Cc: bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, denis@acacia.cts.ucla.edu, grog@lemis.com, questions@FreeBSD.ORG, trouble@webfyre.com Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The problem is that we did test on at least the last BETA version prior to the formal release via some anouncement, but this time we did not do this. Of course, the 2.2-releng site has the BETA version, however, most people do not know when/which will be the last BETA version prior to the formal release. That is why this time we did not get it fully tested. Am I wrong? -Jin }> Not quite, Andre Albsmeier early this morning opened problem report 7381 }> and included a fix. Poor quality control let out a bug in rshd.c. } -------------------- }That comment is totally gratuitous. You imply that we are careless; }bear in mind that FreeBSD is largely a volunteer effort and we do not }have the resources to do even one tenth of the QC and testing a }commercial vendor does. We do our best, but a couple of mistakes }always slip through here and there. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message