Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 20:22:53 PST From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com> To: se@ZPR.Uni-Koeln.DE (Stefan Esser) Cc: andreas@klemm.gtn.com (Andreas Klemm), torstenb@solar.tlk.com (Torsten Blum), fenner@parc.xerox.com, se@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need "a" ghostscript Message-ID: <96Nov8.202258pst.177557@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 08 Nov 96 14:55:25 PST." <199611082255.XAA05048@x14.mi.uni-koeln.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199611082255.XAA05048@x14.mi.uni-koeln.de> you write: >So I'd opt for making the latest GNU Ghostscript 3.xx the base, >and to have Alladin Ghsotscript 4.xx for those, that conform to >the licenzing terms ... I didn't realize there were restrictive licensing terms on ghostscript4. That makes it a bad default dependency for my port that needs a ghostscript. Bill
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?96Nov8.202258pst.177557>