From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 9 21:55:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA12754 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 9 Oct 1998 21:55:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bentley.queens.unimelb.edu.au (bentley.queens.unimelb.edu.au [203.28.244.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA12739 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 1998 21:55:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bromage@bentley.queens.unimelb.edu.au) Received: (from bromage@localhost) by bentley.queens.unimelb.edu.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA17932; Sat, 10 Oct 1998 14:54:51 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from bromage) Message-ID: <19981010145451.34491@queens.unimelb.edu.au> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 14:54:51 +1000 From: Andrew Bromage To: chad@dcfinc.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: firewalling References: <199810092329.QAA28466@freebie.dcfinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89i In-Reply-To: <199810092329.QAA28466@freebie.dcfinc.com>; from Chad R. Larson on Fri, Oct 09, 1998 at 04:29:55PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG G'day all. On Fri, Oct 09, 1998 at 04:29:55PM -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote: > Does anyone have an opinion (now there's a stupid question) about IP > firewalling vs TCP wrappers to protect a server exposed to the great > unwashed Internet? Just as a matter of interest, is there a reason why you don't want to use both? Cheers, Andrew Bromage To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message