From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Nov  8 20:23:43 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA05099
          for ports-outgoing; Fri, 8 Nov 1996 20:23:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA05091;
          Fri, 8 Nov 1996 20:23:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <19129(5)>; Fri, 8 Nov 1996 20:23:09 PST
Received: from localhost by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <177557>; Fri, 8 Nov 1996 20:22:58 -0800
To: se@ZPR.Uni-Koeln.DE (Stefan Esser)
cc: andreas@klemm.gtn.com (Andreas Klemm),
        torstenb@solar.tlk.com (Torsten Blum), fenner@parc.xerox.com,
        se@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Need "a" ghostscript 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 08 Nov 96 14:55:25 PST."
             <199611082255.XAA05048@x14.mi.uni-koeln.de> 
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 20:22:53 PST
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
Message-Id: <96Nov8.202258pst.177557@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199611082255.XAA05048@x14.mi.uni-koeln.de> you write:
>So I'd opt for making the latest GNU Ghostscript 3.xx the base, 
>and to have Alladin Ghsotscript 4.xx for those, that conform to
>the licenzing terms ...

I didn't realize there were restrictive licensing terms on ghostscript4.
That makes it a bad default dependency for my port that needs a ghostscript.

  Bill